I downloaded the live flPuppy Live-CD today with fldigi 3.0 built-in and have been playing around a bit with it and I am impressed. With everyting in RAM it is sure fast. I saved everything and will see if all is restored when I boot the computer again.

Darrel
VE7CUS

On 22-Feb-07, at 10:42 AM, kd4e wrote:

What Linux app would you recommend that offers DominoEX,
especially DEX11 = -12 and DEX22 = -9 with and without FEC?

I am in the midst of a major reorganization of my radio
room and may dedicate a Kenwood TS-180 to digital modes,
including DominoEX and also sstv, dsstv, PSK31, etc ...
seems there are new digital modes or updates to existing
ones every week!

I need to find an affordable older laptop and run the
tiny Puppy Linux OS with digital modes on it. Possibly
an older IBM 600-series as they are very reliable and
lots of parts are available. Whatever I can be sure
will be natively compatible with Linux and will run
directly (if not charge the internal battery) on 12vdc.

WDYT?

> It does seem that DEX22/FEC works better than DEX11 without FEC in
> many cases even though the throughput speed is about the same.
> However, under weak signal condx, I suspect that DEX11 wihout FEC
> would work deeper into the noise. As I am finding out on many HF
> circuits, the ability to handle the vagaries of the ionosphere is
> often more important than the raw ability to handle AWGN.
>
> I did think that MT-63 would do better than DEX11/FEC and DEX22/FEC,
> but it was much worse during the 160 meter test. Signal strengths
> were generally quite good though and QRN was not too bad considering
> the time of year here in the northern hemisphere. It will be most
> interesting to see what happens this summer with static crashes. It
> just seemed like DEX was able to handle static crashes better than
> other non-ARQ modes.
>
> 73, Rick, KV9U

--

Thanks! & 73, doc, KD4E
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Projects: http://ham-macguyver.bibleseven.com
Personal: http://bibleseven.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



Reply via email to