Roger J. Buffington wrote: > > > David Kruh wrote: >> >> Thanks again for everyone who has chimed in. The contest this >> weekend has made contacts difficult, but conversations with WD4KDK, >> N0TAO, N7AXL, and W0CYF and reading the postings I am pretty sure >> that between Windows Me (a real piece of you-all-know-what) and the >> relative slowness of the PII 166MHZ processor (which works fine >> with SSTV, PSK31, and RTTY) I'm not going to get very far with >> digital. > > For gosh sakes, why not ditch ME? It is awful. Caused me endless > troubles till I ditched it. > > de Roger W6VZV
It is also known as Windows MISTAKE EDITION....... Eats more memory than 98SE, attempts to look like 2000 and doesn't gets the jobs done. A friends Celeron 400 (got it with ME and only 32 MB RAM) did not do anything worthwhile until I formatted C: and installed 98SE some 5 years ago. The only loss was ME bells and whistles... It was the quick way out. 2000 requires 64 MB RAM to crawl and 128 to begin being useful. Jose, CO2JA __________________________________________ V Conferencia Internacional de Energía Renovable, Ahorro de Energía y Educación Energética. 22 al 25 de mayo de 2007 Palacio de las Convenciones, Ciudad de la Habana, Cuba http://www.cujae.edu.cu/eventos/cier
