Thanks for the information Chris.  Very helpful and much appreciated.

Happy Easter.

73,

Tony, AD1Y


--- In [email protected], "Chris Danis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> 
> My last message seemed to be modestly well-received, and since then 
I've
> received / seen a number of questions regarding decoding JT65 
signals, so
> here's my stab at addressing those.  Remember that I'm a "newbie" 
myself: I
> haven't even been playing around for WSJT for a whole week!  
Certainly don't
> hesitate to correct me if I say anything wrong, or to ask further 
questions.
> 
> Anatomy of a JT65A signal
> Although JT65A is always a MFSK mode, there are two fundamental 
types of
> JT65A signals: the "full text" ones used to send CQs, exchange 
callsigns and
> signal reports, or any arbitrary text, and the "shorthand" signals 
used to
> send RO, RRR, and 73.  Both kinds of messages have a "sync" tone 
and other
> tones -- in the case of full text messages, many other tones, and 
in the
> case of shorthand messages, just one other tone.  However, the sync 
tone is
> always the tone lowest in frequency, and in my experience with HF 
operation,
> almost always between 1200 and 1300Hz (assuming you are tuned to 
the same
> frequency as the transmitting station).  (For the sake of 
completeness, I
> should also note here that only one tone is transmitted at any 
given time,
> and that transitions between tones are done in a phase-continuous 
manner.)
> 
> Note on full text messages: arbitrary text can be, at most, 13 
characters.
> For those of you who have noticed that e.g. "K3UK N2YYZ FN12   OOO" 
is quite
> a bit longer than 13 characters, JT65 has a special compression 
scheme for
> common message components, like "CQ", "QRZ", "OOO", and callsigns, 
which it
> uses in the standard exchanges.
> 
> Decoding basics
> Start up WSJT.  Make sure "Freeze" is unchecked.  Examine the SpecJT
> window.  You should see a long green bar at the top of your 
passband.  This
> green bar represents the frequency range that WSJT will search for 
signals
> when it attempts a decode.  That's right -- it attempts to decode 
anything
> it can find in that range (as long as the sync tone falls within 
the green
> bar, it should "just work").  This is a feature designed to make
> compensating for EME Doppler easy.  If there's a signal that you 
can hear,
> or even that you cannot hear, WSJT should decode it.  However, you 
will
> probably need to increase your "Recording Settings" "line 
in"/"microphone"
> slider to more than you use for other digital modes.  The WSJT 
documentation
> states that the "RX noise" figure should be around 0dB while you are
> receiving just noise.  I usually don't pump things up this high, 
but I do
> make sure it's above -10dB (the associated status indication turns 
red if
> this condition isn't met).  If you can't use your soundcard's mixer 
to get
> things this high, the rightmost slider at the bottom of the SpecJT 
window is
> "Digital gain" and can increase audio levels more.
> 
> (Aside: here's a point where I would appreciate feedback from 
others who
> have been successful.  How high do you usually turn things up?  Am 
I wrong
> here?)
> 
> Also remember that you will not decode what you just heard until 
the full
> minute has passed (I said 52 seconds in my last message; a more 
accurate
> figure is something like 55 seconds).  This is just due to the 
nature of the
> protocol: each JT65A transmission is sent as a single FEC'd block, 
which is
> one of the things that gives it the weak-signal abilities for which 
it is
> known.
> 
> More "advanced" decoding
> There are a lot of knobs and buttons to play with on the WSJT 
decoder.  I'll
> start with the more important ones...
> 
> Clicking in the SpecJT window (or on the red line plot in the main 
window)
> will set the clicked frequency as the frequency of the sync tone.  
I'll
> reiterate that -- when you click on something in the waterfall, it 
should
> always be the leftmost sync tone!  Once you've given WSJT a 
frequency value
> this way, you can check "Freeze", which locks the search for the 
sync tone
> down to within "Tol" Hz of the frequency you selected.  You can 
vary Tol by
> left or right-clicking on it.  Watch the length of the green bar in 
the
> SpecJT window change as you do this.
> 
> (Cool tip: in the cases where multiple stations have both 
transmitted in the
> same timeslot (with a slight frequency difference), I have often 
been able
> to decode both transmissions by setting Tol to 10, clicking one 
sync tone,
> decoding, and then clicking the other and decoding.)
> 
> Once you've tuned a station, you should leave "Freeze" on.  It 
gives you a
> little more sensitivity, (I think) decreases decode times slightly, 
and also
> makes the shorthand signals (RO/RRR/73) decode without question 
marks.  Once
> you've clicked on the sync tone of a station, SpecJT also shows 
you "helper"
> red ticks on the frequency scale, that indicate where tones for RO, 
RRR, and
> 73 will be seen (from left to right).
> 
> "NB" is what you'd expect -- some sort of noise blanking.  I've 
left it on,
> but I'm not sure if it's actually necessary.  "Zap" somehow 
attempts to
> "zap" away receiver birdies.  I usually keep this off.  Enabling 
either
> probably reduces sensitivity slightly.
> 
> There's another feature of WSJT that is useful for very weak 
signals -- so
> weak that they can't be decoded in one RX period.  It has two slots 
(one for
> the even slot, one for the odd -- I think; not sure on this) where 
it stores
> averages of past signals.  These are displayed in the two-line 
textbox below
> the main textbox.  Thus it is possible to monitor a "dead" channel 
for a few
> RX periods, and suddenly see a signal "pop out of the noise" once 
you've
> done enough averaging.  To use this effectively, though, you must
> occasionally clear the averaging buckets and allow new data to 
accumulate.
> That's what the "Clear Avg" button is for.  (I haven't actually 
decoded an
> otherwise-unreadable signal with this functionality myself, but 
maybe one
> day.)
> 
> 
> I hope this helps, and that it explains more than it confuses.
> 
> best & 73,
> -chris N2YYZ
>


Reply via email to