This is the first time I have heard this. The SCS claim was that P3 can work a little bit deeper into the noise than P2. Why would it use the narrower mode under difficult conditions? Also, P3 can go to a couple of tones I think which are very widely spaced compared to the narrower modes.
73, Rick, KV9U --- In [email protected], "Bill McLaughlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I think PactorII is better than PactorIII in terms of being > efficient; it is why Winlink systems revert to PactorII when > conditions become tough (for an example of my subjectivity).
