> ARRL Withdraws "Regulation by Bandwidth" Petition 

Although this might delay USA hams' release from Technology Jail,
perhaps it will lead to the development of a better bandwidth-based
spectrum management plan, without the need for "AM phone loophole
contortions", ridiculously narrow 200Hz bandwidth segments,
voice-prohibition bands, or data-prohibition bands. 

Perhaps this will also lead to more reasonable HF Automatic Subbands
that could work toward pleasing "both sides of the aisle" such as:

1980-2000 kHz 
3575-3630 kHz 
7100-7125 kHz 
10135-10150 kHz
14100-14125 kHz 
18080-18110 kHz 
21100-21150 kHz 
24900-24930 kHz 
28100-28200 kHz 

It would be good to see band segmentation at more reasonable
power/bandwidths (necessary bandwidth):
500Hz at 1.5kW PEP Transmitter Power 
3kHz at 1.5kW PEP Transmitter Power 
5kHz at 100W PEP Effective Radiated Power in the General SubBands
10kHz at 100W PEP Effective Radiated Power in the Extra SubBands 

500Hz Bandwidth limitation is not needed on some bands, but it would
be helpful on 80-17m bands. Some suggestions for 500Hz SubBand
segmentation:
3500-3535 kHz
7000-7025 kHz
10100-10115 kHz
14000-14025 kHz  
18068-18075 kHz 

This could go along with a reduction of the Extra-only segments at the
bottom of the 80m and 40m bands to:
3500-3510 kHz
7000-7010 kHz

--

73---Bonnie KQ6XA

(Trying out the new Nomex catsuit)



Reply via email to