That's your call, Danny.
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Danny Douglas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have encryption
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 07:57:29 -0400
Outside the envelope - Outside the ham bands.
Danny Douglas N7DC
ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA
SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB all
DX 2-6 years each
.
QSL LOTW-buro- direct
As courtesy I upload to eQSL but if you
use that - also pls upload to LOTW
or hard card.
moderator [EMAIL PROTECTED]
moderator http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Champa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2007 1:27 AM
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have encryption
> Bonnie has done a great job of providing a list, but there
> are some more BIG ones!
>
> 1. List of names of confirmed survivors.
> 2. List of names of confirmed dead.
> 3. List of names of known injured.
> 4. Estimated number of dead and injured.
>
> There are many more situations where Hams would want to pass
> such info along to meal providers, the Red Cross, Salvation Army,
> and some assurance the client would get the information BEFORE
> they watch it in CNN!
>
> Come on folks! Think outside the envelope. These are post 9-11 times!
> We are at war! Wake up. Times have changed.
>
> MARS (all Hams) is already using or prepared to use encryption.
> ARES and RACES can't be far behind.
>
> John - K8OCL
>
> ----Original Message Follows----
> From: "expeditionradio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have encryption
> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 04:07:07 -0000
>
> > Bill N9DSJ wrote:
> > Can see no valid reason for encryption on our frequencies. If one
> > could provide an single example I would be interested......
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> Hams should certainly have the capability to pass over-the-air
> encrypted traffic or scrambled speech for emergencies and disaster
> relief. There are other situations where it would be useful, too. In
> order to have seamless capability in an emergency, hams should be
> familiar and proficient with the use of it on a regular basis.
>
> Encryption should not be with the sole intent to obscure the content
> from other hams, but it should be availble to hams when there is a
> need to shield sensitive data and information from evil-doers.
>
> Here are a few reasons for hams to use limited encryption in the
> over-the-air communication:
>
> 1. To shield private data
> 2. To shield private telephone numbers
> 3. To shield sensitive email addresses
> 4. To shield system passwords
> 5. To shield station remote control
> 6. To secure access to stations
> 7. To control satellites
> 8. To shield messages sent by a 3rd party to ham
> 9. To protect medical information
> 10. To protect 3rd party traffic requiring confidentiality
> 11. To control repeaters
> 12. To shield identities of children
>
> I'm sure there are more reasons... but that's some of the things I
> thought of in the few minutes it took to write this.
>
> Bonnie KQ6XA
>
>
>
>
>
> Announce your digital presence via our DX Cluster
telnet://cluster.dynalias.org
>
> Our other groups:
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dxlist/
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/themixwgroup
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/contesting
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wnyar
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Omnibus97
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.1/778 - Release Date: 4/27/2007
1:39 PM
>
>
