John, You might want to try PocketDigi for Windows or Windows Pocket PC. It does a great job on CW over 25WPM and is free. 73, Leigh/WA5ZNU On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 3:53 pm, John Champa wrote: > So there should NOT be any problem....of course, CW above 25 WPM might > as > well be encrypted as far as I am concerned (HI). > > John - K8OCL
- [digitalradio] Re: ARRL Withdraws "Regulation by B... N6CRR
- Re: [digitalradio] Re: ARRL Withdraws "Regula... mrfarm
- [digitalradio] Re: ARRL Withdraws "Regula... N6CRR
- [digitalradio] Re: ARRL Withdraws "Regula... Bill McLaughlin
- [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have encryp... expeditionradio
- Re: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have en... bruce mallon
- Re: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have en... John Champa
- Re: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have en... mrfarm
- Re: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have en... bruce mallon
- Re: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have en... John Champa
- Re: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have en... Leigh L Klotz, Jr.
- [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have encryp... Chris Jewell
- RE: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have en... John Champa
- RE: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have en... Rodney Kraft
- RE: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have en... John Champa
- RE: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have en... Rodney Kraft
- RE: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have en... John Champa
- Re: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have en... Rodney Kraft
- Re: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have en... John Champa
- Re: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have en... Danny Douglas
- Re: [digitalradio] Re: Hams should have en... John Champa