It seems to me that, that is exactly what we need. Danny Douglas N7DC ex WN5QMX ET2US WA5UKR ET3USA SV0WPP VS6DD N7DC/YV5 G5CTB all DX 2-6 years each . QSL LOTW-buro- direct As courtesy I upload to eQSL but if you use that - also pls upload to LOTW or hard card.
moderator [EMAIL PROTECTED] moderator http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DXandTalk ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Champa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <digitalradio@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 6:58 PM Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Digi Voice: No Bandwidth Limit (was Re: ARRL wake up ......) > John, > > Didn't you read all those many rants on the HSMM pages last year? > > They were all saying the same thing Bonnie is writing here, > i.e., the the ARRL bandwidth proposal takes away privileges > because under exisiting regs there is NO BANDWIDTH limit. > It's the secret hidden in the proposal that nobody wants to talk > about, except Jeff king, WB8WKA, of course (HI). > > 73, > John > K8OCL > > ----Original Message Follows---- > From: "expeditionradio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com > Subject: [digitalradio] Digi Voice: No Bandwidth Limit (was Re: ARRL wake up > ......) > Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 22:43:01 -0000 > > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, "John B. Stephensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > 47cfr97.307(f)(2) limits the bandwidth of all transmissions in the > phone/image segments to that of AM or SSB communications quality audio > which is usually interpreted as 3 kHz. > > John > > KD6OZH > > > Hi John, > > Digital Voice is "Phone" under FCC's definition. > There is no bandwidth limit on a "phone" signal, implied or otherwise, > for a digital voice signal. > > You either made an error or you are reading your FCC rules wrong. Here > is what the rule actually says: > ====== > 97.307 > (f) The following standards and limitations apply to transmissions on > the frequencies specified in §97.305(c) of this Part. > "(2) No non-phone emission shall exceed the bandwidth of a > communications quality phone emission of the same modulation type. The > total bandwidth of an independent sideband emission (having B as the > first symbol), or a multiplexed image and phone emission, shall not > exceed that of a communications quality A3E emission." > ====== > > As you can see, that rule is for non-phone. Currently, the non-phone > modes defined by FCC in those §97.305(c) frequency bands are "image" > "data" "RTTY" "multiplexed emission" and "CW". If you read them > carefully, you will find that the FCC rules are really unclear > regarding any finite bandwidth limit for these non-phone modes on HF. > That is because these ancient rules were written in the middle ages of > digital signal technology. > > I will be happy to provide a examples of how the rules allow very > wideband data bandwidth on HF, if you like. > > 73---Bonnie KQ6XA > > > > > Announce your digital presence via our Interactive Sked Page at > http://www.obriensweb.com/drsked/drsked.php > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.2/782 - Release Date: 5/1/2007 2:10 AM > >