First of all , I am not a "propeller head" and am the first to admit so.  My
technical ability is limited to firing up my computer, installing whatever

Software developed by people much more talented than I am, and using it on
the air.

 

I am heavily involved in emergency communications, hence my interest in
digital modes. I teach emergency management and communications, 

Search and rescue team leader, and search management courses . I am a
participant in all emergency training activities in our province, and have
been called out numerous times to assist Fire Police and EMS over the past
15 years . I work under contract to the City of Regina, as the Director of
Emergency Social services, co-ordinating the efforts of the City, Red Cross,
Salvation Army, and private sector contractors to provide shelter for those
unfortunate folks displaced by disasters. I have written and number of
articles on Search and Rescue, as well as a SAR needs analysis for
Saskatchewan Justice and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police.

 

My interest in these modes are to adapt them to emergency communications in
our Province, in conjunction with ARES, so that we can rapidly pass traffic
from remote locations to EOC's and reception centers. Our geography and
population base makes the need for radio amateur communications an essential
service using VHF, HF , and the internet.  We have adopted several of these
modes already and are looking forward to the development of an ARQ mode
which will allow us an internet gateway without the need for an SCS modem. I
and several other VE5's happily test these modes under a variety of
conditions and provide feedback to the authors.

 

I am also a "hard-core" rag chewer, and really enjoy getting on the air with
one of these new modes and shooting the breeze, and am able to do so at the
bottom of the solar cycle, and a very modest station, using the new digital
modes.

 

By your own admission, your operating experience with digital modes has not
progressed beyond  PSK31.  There have been many improvements since then with
people like Simon, Patrick, Pavel, Dmitry and many others pioneering new and
very effective operating modes, some of which are proving to be almost as
effective as CW in poor operating conditions ( as an example, Olivia) . 

 

I challenge you to try some of these new modes, and I and others would
welcome your opinion of these new technologies. At the same time would
encourage you to put some of your considerable technical ability into
developing  busy frequency software In cooperation with one of the authors,
rather than simply complaining about it at every opportunity. 

 

John

VE5MU

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave AA6YQ
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 10:30 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Dave Bernstein AA6YQ
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] ALE , J65, Pactor 1 thru ?, etc.

 

First, John, I will point out that you have never provided a serious
technical response to any of the points made regarding the importance of
listening before transmitting, and the opportunity to enable polite,
unattended operation via busy frequency detectors. You mostly snipe and make
lame personal attacks, like this one.

 

My primary log contains 22 keyboard-to-keyboard Pactor QSOs, ~500 PSK31
QSOs, ~150 PSK63 QSOs, and more than 2100 RTTY QSOs; I have 319 countries
confirmed on RTTY. During operations from KH6, KP2, FJ, and V4, I've made
another couple of hundred PSK31 QSOs and more than 600 RTTY QSOs. If you're
so active, why aren't you in any of my logs?

 

Besides DXing, I spend a fair amount of time developing and supporting
WinWarbler, a member of the freeware DXLab Suite whose logging and
transceiver control components are also used with MixW, MultiPSK, and DM780.
I've also been supporting the ADIF specification for the past couple of
years -- the standard used for interchange among logging applications and
services like LotW and eQSL.cc.

 

What's been your contribution, John?

 

     73,

 

          Dave, AA6YQ

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of John Bradley
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 10:09 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [digitalradio] ALE , J65, Pactor 1 thru ?, etc.

Allrighty, then! (climbing up on soapbox)

I guess I am getting a little tired of these arguments about operating
correctly. We all know the rules and most

of us try to follow them. Sure, we screw up once in a while but so what? We
learn for the next time.

What bothers me more is that the folks who make the most noise and offer the
most criticism of the modes

Are not those who are using them. As an example, Dave, AA6YQ, has written
numerous emails on digital radio

Subjects, and yet I, for one have yet to work him in any digital mode, and I
have been very active for the past

number of years. I have meticulously checked all my logs, and surprise! No
Dave.

Everyone else is there, in fact many times over: Roger, Bonnie, Andy, Rick
,Jose, Txema and the list goes on,

With many that I have missed mentioning who are active in this group. Just
guessing, I would think that most folks have not come across Dave in their
logs.

Now that is not saying that Dave doesn't have valid arguments- some of them
are. I respectfully suggest, though

That you get on these modes, get active and "walk a mile in our moccasins"
to fully understand the nature of these modes.

Ok Dave I'll lend you the soapbox

John

VE5MU

 

Reply via email to