Posted by: "Greg" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Thu Oct 18, 2007 11:47 pm (PST)
   
  Apparently Bonnie is ignoring me because I keep asking how can you
call winlink a 24/7 system when you need a live operator to generate
the email and a live operator on the other end to read it. Lot of good
that email does going to that automatic system only to sit there
because no one, according to Bonnie's message below, is around to get it. 

Greg
KC7GNM

  ==========
   
  Others are being ignored because the questions are too hard to answer. 
  Back to the topic:
   
  I have read nothing that justifies why these wide band modes need to overtake 
the allocation of other modes. It appears to be a group that belongs to a 
sub-sub section of the population that believes they should have more of the 
pie over 99% of the whole.
   
  The emergency line of discussion is mute. All modes are needed during an 
emergency. But, there in no signal that is more important than the call for 
help in what ever form it need be. The op center reports and HQ updates should 
never interrupt or negate that priority.
   
  If you want the respect of other hams world wide, improve the robots. Make 
them more efficient in use of band width. Make them reactive to other signals 
on the frequencies. Make them better so they do not create QRM to other modes 
or themselves. Don't complain about your neighbors house when your own house 
needs fixing.
   
  As I often say to people who have problems, "It is not the machine, tool, 
device, or technology that is good or bad, it is how you use it."
   
  Since my last three posts never got thru the email reflector, and I am not 
sure that this one will, I am done on this topic. I don't know if I have ticked 
off the moderators (no, Andy...)  or the internet gods, but I am out of this 
discussion. I will delete this topic without reading from this point forward.
   
  73 es God Bless,
   
  Dan, KA3CTQ

 __________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to