Rick, RM-11392 is a most excellent example of a bad petition in my opinion. As Andrew stated, "The proposal has no chance of being adopted".
Also, I don't see any relevance to your CW vs. SSB comments and RM-11392. I don't know where the heck you operate CW, even with my oldest hybrid transceiver and 250hz Fox Tango filter I could easily work CW stations among the worst SSB and I have when weak stations have called me for a split mode contact to break through during SSB pile ups, this is very common in contesting, especially on VHF+ I have no more time to waste discussing RM-11392, it is a dead issue in view. 73 /s/ Steve, N2CKH At 05:38 PM 12/27/2007, you wrote: >Hi Again, Steve, > >I think that you are also supporting "protectionism" as I am, only you >don't think of it that way. It protects the users of incompatible modes >from reducing the use of the spectrum. There may be no technical way for >them to coexist unless you literally drive them off. Some may feel that >way, but I do not. And it was not until I really tried using CW when the >SSB operators encroached that I realized how bad it can get. The SSB >operators may have multiple notch filters that can remove tones, but >even that is not often satisfactory. CW can not cope well with SSB and >similar waveforms, even with the narrowest filters.
