Hello Howard, >NOOO.....it's cluttered......really.
I think that it is not cluttered at all. This GUI corresponds to what I need i.e.: * not to waste time in searching the wished command or to switch of mode or sub-mode (minimum of menus, maximum of buttons, panel of modes...), * always the maximum of information directly available on the screen (many hints, contextual help with right click, QRGs, actual configuration...). I hope that this corresponds also to some other needs. Now you think sincerely that it is cluttered. Nice! As we say "Les goûts et les couleurs ne se discutent pas" which means "It is useless to discuss tastes and colours". 73 Patrick ----- Original Message ----- From: w6ids To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 2:26 AM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Redefining SSTV operations Hey Patrick! NOOO.....it's cluttered......really. You fall back onto that old song of yours about not being a specialist, which I take in this context to mean talented enough, to work with the GUI. I don't believe that for a minute, my good man. Working the GUI may not be one of your more interesting chores and you may not have a clue as to an improved layout, but don't tell me you don't have the talent to handle it. "I" don't have the talent for it.... I think. I've been on this planet 60-plus years now; I can tell when someone is blowing smoke in my direction....well, usually...uh...most of the time. Best Regards, Sir.... Howard W6IDS Richmond, IN ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Lindecker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <digitalradio@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 4:16 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: Redefining SSTV operations Hello Howard, <SNIP> <SNIP> But I understand that you think it is cluttered. It is simply complex (as digital modes are not always very simple). However I'm not a specialist of programs and GUI. Anyway we have the chance to have a big diversity of excellent programs, so... 73 Patrick
