Ups.. I thought I had the newest one but it was 3.0.123 . I will upgrade to 3.0.131 .
LA5VNA Steinar Russell Blair wrote: > The older version was 3.0.125 the newer one is 3.0.131 if you look at the > about tab at the top. > > Russell > > > > ================= > IN GOD WE TRUST ! > ================= > Russell Blair (NC5O) > Skype-Russell.Blair > Hell Field #300 > DRCC #55 > 30m Dig-group #693 > > --- On Tue, 1/6/09, Siegfried Jackstien <[email protected]> > wrote: > > From: Siegfried Jackstien <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m > To: [email protected] > Date: Tuesday, January 6, 2009, 11:16 PM > > > > > > > > which version do you have?? date of the file?? > norbert dropped me a mail where he said there was a mistake with center > frequence of the filter > he corrected the mistake and uploaded the new one to his homepage > simply download it again and delete the older one.... version number is still > 3.0 ... so not easy to see if you have the newest version > do you guys know how the thing with the pilot tone works??? ... norbert > explained it to me in a mail > the pilot tone switches the receiving station to the right mode/speed .... > with lower speed the performance is much better with lower signal > if you see a pilottone just make a rectangle with your mousecursor round the > tone > hold the mousebutton pressed make your rectangle > the soft looks how long the rectangle is and on whitch frequence the > pilottone is > decoding should start very easy after that > hope i could help a bit > good luck with the new mode > best 73´s de dg9bfc > sigi > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Steinar Aanesland > To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 9:42 PM > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: MFTTY on 40m > > > > > Hi all, > > I had my first qso in MFTTY now with OH7JJT on 3596 usb + 1000Hz. > My first impression is positive. The software is very easy and intuitive > to use. The mode > works OK, but it is not very fond of QRM ;) > > la5vna Steinar > > Steinar Aanesland wrote: > >> OK qsy 3.583 Khz dial usb + 1000 hz >> la5vna Steinar >> >> >> >> >> >> Graham wrote: >> >> >>> Try 3.583 Khz dial usb + 1000 hz ? >>> >>> 596 has a spur from a local mw tx - G .. >>> >>> >>> --- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, Steinar Aanesland <saa...@...> >>> >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Ok, I will qsy 3596 usb + 1000Hz (3596 usb dial) >>>> and calling CQ >>>> >>>> la5vna Steinar >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Graham wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> No signal showing in past hour ... too close for 7 in the >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> night .. >>> >>> >>> >>>>> would be better on 80 or 160 ??? 160 may be better ?? >>>>> >>>>> G .. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, Steinar Aanesland <saanes@> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Graham, >>>>>> >>>>>> I am calling CQ on 7068 USB +1000Hz . Do you see me ? >>>>>> >>>>>> LA5VNA Steinar >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Graham wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> --- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, "rich3x" <rh3x@> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Will qsx & send cq's on 7068 usb +1000Hz 1/2 speed during day >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>> 6 >>> >>> >>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>> Jan. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>>> Does this mode work well/attracted any significant attention? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> de Rich/N2JR >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sounds a little like the theam from laural and hardy ! .. just >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> noticed, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> it 'has' to be the top application or it seems to stall ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> looking at 7068 carrier freq ? or do you mean dial frequency ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> just >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> noise >>>>>>> >>>>>>> G .. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>> -- >>> >>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> ------ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg. com >>>>>>> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>> Date: >>> >>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> 06.01.2009 07:56 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> ------ >>> >>> >>> >>>>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>>>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg. com >>>>> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> 06.01.2009 07:56 >>> >>> >>> >>>>> >>> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - >>> >>> >>> No virus found in this incoming message. >>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg. com >>> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 06.01.2009 >>> 07:56 >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- - >> >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg. com >> Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1878 - Release Date: 06.01.2009 >> 07:56 >> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.10.3/1879 - Release Date: 06.01.2009 > 17:16 > >
