Also, would it not be beneficial to have something like this implemented in the the unattended Pactor stations.
A physical convergence layer for all. 73 philw de ka1gmn On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:33 AM, aa777888athotmaildotcom < aa777...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > You know what's really exciting? We are a hop, skip and jump away from a > powerful, lightweight ALE implementation that would probably outperform > MIL-STD-188-141A by a large margin. > > Right now the code scans an entire 3KHz bandwidth for RSID (or more with > SDR). When you add in the future, planned SELCAL feature the only things > missing after that are scanning and an automated response. > > It also appears possible that the software would be capable of > automatically choosing an empty spot on the waterfall to make the call. This > would allow all calls to occur simultaneously and therefore I would suggest > time synchronized scanning a la JT65 or WSPR in order to improve probability > of intercept without long or repetitive RSID transmissions. Say 4 second > dwell per band to allow a +/-1 second guard band on the timing (given a 2 > second RSID transmission length). The occasional collision would be worth > the simplicity and reliability. > > Thanks again, Simon! > > Scott > k*b*l*0*0*q > > > --- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com <digitalradio%40yahoogroups.com>, > "Simon \(HB9DRV\)" <simon.br...@...> wrote: > > > > I think it'll take up to a year - then we'll be rocking. > > > > Also when we use SDR more there will be a big improvement. > > > > Simon Brown, HB9DRV > > www.ham-radio-deluxe.com > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Tony > > > > I think we're making progress with RSID Dave, it's just slow to catch on. > Have a look at the RSID video in the file section of this reflector. > > > > >
