Andy,

I Live in Dallas, TX and there are neighbors who have relatives on the coast 
who need Ham guys to help out in times of Hurricanes or some other kind of 
emergencies. I heard that WinLink got its claim to fame during the Katrina 
disaster, because of this WinLink got a real boost and has a large base over 
other HF email solutions.

"via the Internet abd the Telnet client."  I am using Windows XP and do not 
have a Unix computer, but can use telnet in command mode via DOS.  Have not 
used Unix in years even though I retired from Sun Microsystems in 2004. These 
days all my computers are Windows XP mainly because of the software I use and 
my XYL uses.

"WINLINK is easy and you do not need HF to use it"
Anyway, I thought the whole purpose of WinLink is to get email access when you 
do not have internet access. If I have Internet access I don't really need 
WinLink. So in my case I really need HF not VHF. This is what I want for 
emergency operations. When Power and communications are down, we can use email 
via HF as a client. I do not have WinLink because I have do not have a hardware 
TNC of any kind, just a HF Radio (ICOM-746), PC (dedicated Lenovo NetBook 3g of 
memory) and a Buxcom Rascal. I do use many of the digital modes via FLDIGIROL 
and really like Olivia and Domino EX and FLDIGI has a email solution via 
psk250.  I am on 30m most days. I was looking for a software email solution 
when ran into to a WinLink guy in California and he told me about WINMOR. I 
don't think he knew it was not ready for prime time since he has a real Pactor 
III TNC. It still looks to me that your are pretty much stuck without this 
piece of hardware if you really need to do
 WinLink via HF. It looks to me that WinLink is great for guys at sea who can 
afford the hardware, but I don't see it for hams guys on limited funds. Maybe 
pskmail is better for us guys without this expensive hardware.

I do not have WinLink and I understand I do not know all of what It can and can 
not do.

So I really don't understand your answer, Andy. Please give me some more detail 
and tell me what I am missing.

Thanks in advance,

Warren - K5WGM


--- On Mon, 8/24/09, Andrew O'Brien <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Andrew O'Brien <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] WINMOR
To: [email protected]
Date: Monday, August 24, 2009, 6:26 AM






 




    
                  WINMOR is still several months from initial release.  WINLINK 
is easy

and you do not need HF to use it, your can use it without Pactor via

VHF (Packet) or via the Internet abd the Telnet client.



Andy K3UK



On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Tim N9PUZ<tim.n9...@gmail. com> wrote:

>

>

> I do not think an actual price has been mentioned but I recall the

> idea is just for the development team to partially fund some needed

> test equipment for future projects. An example mentioned a while back

> was "under $50" but I do not recall if that was from someone on the

> development team or not.

>

> With all they provide free of charge I expect that if it is not free

> it will be affordable for anyone who needs it. Consider that WINMOR is

> a sound card mode. Since you don't have to buy even a 1200 baud style

> TNC, that would make WINMOR worth at least the $75 you might pay for

> the least expensive TNC kit you can buy.

>

> Tim, N9PUZ

>

> Russell Blair wrote:

>>

>> Warren, It's my understanding that WINMOR is not going to be free

>> software, that going to cost something. ? do you know what the price

>> goig to be.?

>>

>> Russell

>

> 



-- 

Andy


 

      

    
    
        
         
        
        








        


        
        


      

Reply via email to