Patrick, Thanks for adding the messaging feature. Andy, K3UK, and I were able to copy Sholto's, RS messages some 3700km away on 20 meters. Sholto, K7TMG, was running 5 watts and a vertical antenna. We found the high sensitivity of the message mode useful as signals fell below the decode threshold of the chat modes we were using at the time.
> The RS ID is detectable at -16 dB but the Call ID only at about -13 dB > (however still better > than PSK31). Very sensitive, more than most sound card chat-modes. I'm not sure why Patrick, but my SNR tests indicate that the RSID used for mode detection has a 6db advantage over the CALL ID. I ran both modes through the path simulator 10 times each and established a minimum SNR when they decoded 10 out-of 10 times or 100%. I'll check all levels and try again. Thanks Patrick. Tony -K2MO ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Lindecker" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 4:38 PM Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Message ID in multipsk > Hello Tony, > > The Call ID that I just have slightly modified is based on a specific RS ID > code (it was the most simple, but it is not a mode ID, just a borrowing) on > which is implemented a more conventional frame (56 bits + CRC). The RS ID is > detectable at -16 dB but the Call ID only at about -13 dB (however still > better than PSK31). > > 73 > Patrick > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Tony > To: [email protected] > Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 7:52 PM > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Message ID in multipsk > > > > > > Steinar, > > > I am testing the " Message ID" in Patrick's latest beta of the > > MULTIPSK (VERSION 4.16 of 27/10/2009) on 14.074. > > I haven't had the opportunity to use the message ID on-the-air, but I did > test the mode between two PC's and it seems to work fine. > > I would assume the Reed Solomon messaging will be just as sensitive and > robust as RS ID; should work well. Hope to see you on the air Steinar... > > Tony -K2MO > > > > > >
