I don't think we should encourage texting or CW while driving! All attention 
needs to be your driving. Driving is dangerous enough even with full attention. 
Pull over to the side of the road and text or CW please. We don't need another 
silent key.

K5WGM


--- On Sun, 5/23/10, Tony <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Tony <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Mobile CW
To: [email protected]
Date: Sunday, May 23, 2010, 3:14 AM







 



  


    
      
      
      





 

  
  Hal/Tony,

  

I wonder if the serious CW mobile operators might invent some CW

sending capability from there steering wheels ? Since one's hands are

on the sterring wheel most of the time some thumb sending might work.

  

Andy

  
  
  
  



That would be much more convenient Andy. The only problem is having to
pause when making sharp turns; not an issue on the highway. Patrick
remembed reading about a ham who used a specialized set of false teeth
to send code! Can you imagine the looks he got with a wire hanging out
of his mouth while his jaw was chattering away to 73 :  )



Gotta give him credit though, that's one way to go hands-free! 



Tony -K2MO   








  
  
  
  

On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Tony <d...@optonline. net> wrote:

> On 5/21/2010 4:28 AM, Hal Stang wrote:

>> Thanks Tony I appreciate.  And will let you know when I am on
"the Road"

>> LOL. I worked mobile CW for years. LOL.

>> 73, thanks for your time.

>> Hal

>> WD4MDA

>>

>

> Me too Hal! I used to take along a Bulldog mini paddle

> http://www.amateurr adioproducts. com/
and use it with the Icom 706. The

> built-in keyer works well once you tweak it a bit.

>

> Lots of fun, but a good size bump in the road can really scramble
your

> sending for a moment, especially with the Econo-box I drove hi.

> Hope to work you ALE-400 /M. That would be a first for me!

>

> Tony -K2MO

>

>

>> ----- Original Message -----

>> From: "Tony"<d...@optonline. net>

>> To:<digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com>

>> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 3:53 AM

>> Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Speech-to-Text for the Handicapped

>>

>>

>>

>>> On 5/21/2010 3:28 AM, Hal Stang wrote:

>>>

>>>> All,

>>>> I am setting up my mobile rig again(icom 706/High
Sierra

>>>> Screwdriver/ Ameritron amp).  I wonder if you could run
ALE400 or other

>>>> digital modes from the mobile using speech recognition
software???

>>>> Hal

>>>> WD4MDA

>>>>

>>>>

>>> Hal,

>>>

>>> Skip Teller can answer your questions - see the thread on
this subject.

>>>

>>> Tony -K2MO

>>>

>>> PS: Let us know when you're on the road.

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>> ----- Original Message -----

>>>> From: "Tony"<d...@optonline. net>

>>>> To:<digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com>

>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 6:41 PM

>>>> Subject: [digitalradio] Speech-to-Text for the
Handicapped

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>> All,

>>>>>

>>>>> Andy brought up the digital mode / text-to-speech
idea recently and a

>>>>> thought came to mind that this could help the
handicapped. I'm not sure

>>>>> if speech-to-text programs can transfer text to
another application

>>>>> right out of the box, but assuming they did, there
would still be the

>>>>> need for voice commands to control the program.
Seems a second sound

>>>>> card may be needed as well; VAC might help.

>>>>>

>>>>> Skip Teller created Digitalk for the blind (thanks
Skip) and Patrick

>>>>> wrote an interface for it (thank you Patrick) so
the programs can talk.

>>>>> Andy's speech-to-text idea would complete the
package. It's easy to

>>>>> suggest something like this while standing on the
shoulders of experts

>>>>> like Patrick and Skip; I can only imagine what it
takes to write the

>>>>> code.

>>>>>

>>>>> Just a thought.

>>>>>

>>>>>    Tony -K2MO

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>>

>>>>> ------------ --------- --------- ------

  
  

  

  

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
signature database 5136 (20100521) __________

  

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

  

  http://www.eset. com









    
     

    
    


 



  






      

Reply via email to