John:
I am sorry that I did not make myself clear enough. My argument is
directed to transmitted signal formats. That is, what is covered by §97.307
Emission standards.
Les
Lester B Veenstra MØYCM K1YCM
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]
US Postal Address:
PSC 45 Box 781
APO AE 09468 USA
UK Postal Address:
Dawn Cottage
Norwood, Harrogate
HG3 1SD, UK
Telephones:
Office: +44-(0)1423-846-385
Home: +44-(0)1943-880-963
Guam Cell: +1-671-788-5654
UK Cell: +44-(0)7716-298-224
US Cell: +1-240-425-7335
Jamaica: +1-876-352-7504
This e-mail and any documents attached hereto contain confidential or
privileged information. The information is intended to be for use only by
the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the
intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the e-mail to
the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution
or use of the contents of this e-mail or any documents attached hereto is
prohibited.
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of "John Becker, WØJAB"
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2010 6:44 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] source coding, Randomizing
By the same thinking (that being that a commercial company) is making
any money should you not put kenwood and yaesu into the same?
Or how about that mean money making company that made your sound card
interface.
or microsoft.
John, W0JAB
At 10:12 AM 6/6/2010, you wrote:
>You can of course protect your intellectual property. But such a commercial
format belongs on commercial frequencies. That is, it has no place as a
format used for amateur radio.
