He is wiping out the weak JT8 and JT65 signals.  Is there no way to contact him?

--- In [email protected], Steinar Aanesland <saa...@...> wrote:
>
> 
> No, he is still on 14.078 sending his WX reports.
> 
> la5vna Steinar
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 24.06.2010 14:31, Warren Moxley wrote:
> > was anyone successful in getting him to move to 14.100 and up?
> > de Warren / K5WGM
> >
> > --- On Thu, 6/24/10, Sean Gilbert, International Editor - WRTH 
> > <sean.gilb...@...> wrote:
> >
> > From: Sean Gilbert, International Editor - WRTH <sean.gilb...@...>
> > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] QRM maker on 14.078 CF
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: Thursday, June 24, 2010, 2:59 AM
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >
> >
> >   
> >
> >
> >     
> >       
> >       
> >       I also noticed this signal yesterday, very strong here in the UK. I 
> > have to
> >
> > admit this is the first time I have heard it but that may simply be because
> >
> > I have not been on 14076 at the times it has been active. Surely a station
> >
> > such as this should be further up the band, around 14100 where the rest of
> >
> > the mailboxes and the like seem to be (avoiding 14.100 though as some of us
> >
> > do actually use the beacons there!). That PSKMail station certainly ruined a
> >
> > few QSO's and made the top end of the JT65 activity centre quite useless (I
> >
> > am loathe to say 'sub band' or 'allocation' as that is simply not true - it
> >
> > is neither) . 
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > ----         
> >
> > 73 de 
> >
> > Sean Gilbert 
> >
> > G4UCJ - G4001SWL - SWLR-ZN018 
> >
> >  
> >
> > Buckingham, Bucks. IO92MA 
> >
> > Email: sean.gilb...@... 
> >
> > Web: http://www.hfradio.org.uk 
> >
> >  
> >
> > TXR: IC756pro 
> >
> > RX2: Racal RA1792 
> >
> > ANT 1: Wellbrook ALA1530 @ 3m agl 
> >
> > ANT 2: 10.5m OCF dipole @ 10m agl 
> >
> > 30MDG: #0464; #0463L; EPC: #008L; #015L; NDG# 0163 CDG: #150 
> >
> > DMC: #016SWL; #017SWL; #990; PODXS 070: #139
> >
> >
> >
> >     
> >      
> >
> >     
> >     
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> >
> >
> >   
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >       
> >
>


Reply via email to