Why is it we're still even discussing this? The mode is questionable, the quirks are many, the value is dubious, the author a non-ham with a BIG attitude, and he controls our computers. (Not mine, glad I never got around to downloading) Why should we be his pawns and feed his ego? Best thing we could do is simple end the debate, change the subject, and allow ROS to die its deserved death by neglect. It didn't have to go that way, but it is what it became by choice of the one who engineered it. Laurie & several others critiques seem quite valid. So why the ongoing debate? Let it end here & now!
Just my cent worth. Stu AF6IT --now SK on the subject --- In [email protected], "Laurie, VK3AMA" <group...@...> wrote: > > With this action (or inaction) from Mr ROS and considering all of his > past actions/comments it becomes clear (to me) that he has an agenda and > Hams are being used as beta-testers to help fulfil his ultimate goal. > > He has shown several times an unwillingness to embrace "Ham Spirit" and > "Ham Operating Standards". > > His Agenda? I suspect it is commercial in nature. > > My thoughts. > > de Laurie, VK3AMA > > >
