Very simple change just add ³greater than 3 khz² to the existing rules.

On 7/13/10 3:28 PM, "Dave Wright" <[email protected]> wrote:

>  
>  
>  
>    
> 
> I think that a lot of people are missing the point with ROS and Spread
> Spectrum here in the US.
> 
> The author defined it as Spread Spectrum, only changing it to FSK144 (or
> whatever) after being told that SS was not allowed below 1.25m in the US.  The
> FCC rules don't mention bandwidth in relationship to SS, they don't say that
> it "must employ bandwidths that greatly exceed the bandwidth necessary to
> convey the intelligence", nor do they reference any Wikipedia/ARRL/RSGB/ITU or
> other organization's definition.  They simply mention SS as not being allowed
> below 1.25m.  So, you can say that it is only 2.2kHz in bandwidth, but if it
> is spread spectrum within that 2.2kHz of bandwidth, it is illegal in the US
> below 1.2m.  It could be 500Hz in bandwidth, but if it uses SS, then it is
> illegal.
> 
> Is this the way it should be?  No.  Does it impede innovation and development
> of new mod es?  Yes.  However, the way the rule is written is what we have to
> follow.  Don't like it?  Then petition the FCC to modify part 97 to allow SS
> within a limited bandwidth (say 3 kHz).  As Skip has pointed out, there is a
> way to do this without mentioning ROS (or CHIP64/128) or any other SS mode.
> Quote the definition and petition for a modification, possibly with a
> bandwidth restriction, possibly without.  But, without changing the rule, the
> rest of the discussion is moot.
> 
> Dave
> K3DCW
> 
> 
> On Jul 13, 2010, at 2:23 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
>>   
>> Hi Alan, 
>> 
>> Why did you wait so long with contributing here?
>> Please explain.
>> 
>> ++  In Feb of this year I quoted from the ARRL's Spread Spectrum Source book
>> page 5-2 ++
>> 
>> "  Spread Spectrum Fundamentals "
>> 
>> SS systems employ radio frequency bandwidths that greatly exceed the
>> bandwidth necessary
>> to convey the intelligence.
>> 
>> Bandwidths for SS systems generally run from 10 to 100 times the information
>> rate.
>> 
>> etc etc.
>> 
>> I got shouted out of the Group by addressing the use of ROS in the US by the
>> experts on
>> SS.
> 
> 
> Dave
> K3DCW
> www.k3dcw.net <http://www.k3dcw.net>
> 
>  
>    
> 
> 

Reply via email to