What are you basing that statement on?? The Hamspots page? You need to take a look at the left column - see the red squares? That indicates that the spot was auto-generated by the ROS software -- BOGUS spots! The real spots are the ones w/o the red square - I didn't see more than a dozen of those when I looked yesterday compared to 50 or 60 bogus spots.
ROS is dead! The author is killing it! Quit poking it with a stick and let it go away! Jeff -- KE7ACY ----- Original Message ----- From: [email protected] Hello Steinar, It is gaining in usage and popularity. Even the spam messages do not seem to make a difference. I for one, thought it would, wrong again! Amateur Radio a la 2010 73 Rein W6SZ -----Original Message----- >From: Steinar Aanesland <[email protected]> >Sent: Jul 14, 2010 10:58 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [digitalradio] New question > >Hello friends, > >I don't know about you , but I feel it is time to leave Jose and his ROS >mode now. >He doesn't deserve that much attention. > >la5vna Steinar > > > > > > > >On 14.07.2010 12:06, Dave Wright wrote: >> Wasn't that part of the infamous fake FCC response that Jose posted on his >> website? >> >> >> On Jul 14, 2010, at 1:38 AM, Rein A wrote: >> >> >>> Noticed this statement in a report of an exchange with a custom >>> agent at FCC: >>> >>> "ROS is not "Spread Spectrum" because the 3khz HF standard channel is >>> maintained. Other modes like MT63, Olivia o[r] Contestia use similar >>> techniques." >>> >>> I do not know who wrote it. >>> >>> What is the problem with it? >>> >>> 73 Rein W6SZ >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Dave >> K3DCW >> www.k3dcw.net >>
