burkesville ' a long way from W-DC , no ones is going to ride that far , dident bonnie & clyde hide out roun there for a while :)
--- In [email protected], AA0OI <aa...@...> wrote: > > What is absurd is that its a fight in the first place.. do you ever just > back up > and look at what is being said?? Your all acting like this is life or > death..ITS NOT..I have been using it all along... NO FCC at my door,, NO > FBI,, > NO KGB.. You are all fighting for something that no one cares about.. > Cross > all the T's and Dot all the I's--- but the key is NO ONE is looking to see if > its been done.. > > And ANYONE who puts "Our Freedom" and "Absurd" in the same sentence needs to > move to Iraq.. see if they agree with you ! >  > Garrett / AA0OI > > > > > ________________________________ > From: Jeff Moore <tnetcen...@...> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 5:30:15 PM > Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better ! > >  >  > A smart man picks his fights carefully. Comparing this discussion to the > fight > for our freedom is absurd. >  > Jeff -- KE7ACY > > ----- Original Message ----- From: AA0OI > >  >  >  >  >  >  > Julian: > I apologize for my county men,, forgive them for they know not what they > ARE > TALKING about. > If they would all just shut up and use it,, NO ONE,, including the Federal > Communist Committee, would even care.. > Lately my country men seem to like to start wars that we can not win.. (we > weren't always like this) > Garrett / AA0OI > > > > > ________________________________ > From: g4ilo <jul...@g4ilo. com> > To: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com > Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 4:51:38 PM > Subject: [digitalradio] Re: ROS back bigger and better ! > >  > > > --- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, Alan Beagley <ajbeagley@ .> wrote: > > > > > > But the FCC has already written -- according to a document I found the > > other day but can't be bothered to look for again now -- words to the > > effect that "the inventor says it's spread spectrum, and he should know > > what it is he invented, so therefore it's illegal on HF." > > I thought what they gave was an opinion, which is really no more valid than > yours or mine if it's still ultimately your responsibility to decide what's > legal and what's not. Whilst I can understand the cautious wanting to take > what > they said at face value, I really can't imagine they would come down on > anyone > who had sound technical grounds for believing that they are wrong, but > perhaps I > don't understand how things work in the US. > > > > > ISTM that the only way to get around that one is to claim that the > > inventor is an idiot. Or perhaps that he was trying to big-note himself. > > > > The inventor is an idiot, but not for that reason. The fact that he > originally > described it as SS doesn't mean that he meant what the FCC understood by the > term SS. > > Anyway it's up to you guys. This argument keeps on going round and round in > circles without my help. > > Julian, G4ILO >
