Hi Xavier,
On Sun, Sep 01, 2024 at 11:17:53PM +0200, Xavier Del Campo Romero wrote:
This other method has a slightly not
uniform distribution, but only runs rand() 70 times:
Which is probably okay for this case.
I also think it is good enough.
Then, I think using our own set may be the most readable solution here,
which also allows the quick module method.
I agree.
Please, take a look at this PR:
https://github.com/dillo-browser/dillo/pull/256
Here is the raw patch series for "git am":
https://github.com/dillo-browser/dillo/pull/256.patch
It would be nice if you can test it with slcl to know it works fine.
Best,
Rodrigo.
_______________________________________________
Dillo-dev mailing list -- dillo-dev@mailman3.com
To unsubscribe send an email to dillo-dev-le...@mailman3.com
