Hi Rodrigo, Rodrigo Arias <rodar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I decided to leave on YES for a simple reason: the laptop I was using > Dillo on didn't have a middle button, so the only way to close the > tabs was to press both buttons at the same time to emulate the middle > one (or the X button). So I assumed that it is possible that the same > scenario happens to other people too which only use an old laptop, > and they may think that the only way to close tabs is on the X button > on the right, as we don't have an X over each tab. > > Of course you can always change it to your preferences, but I think > it is a safer default this way to be easily discovered. Sounds fair, thanks for explaining. I guess there is no 'one size fits all' solution, but the setting is easy enough to change. I like the middle button specifically because it is harder to push, making it more difficult to close a tab by accident. > I would also prefer opening new tabs without the mouse wheel button > or the keyboard. So far I can to by clicking and holding the right > button, dragging a couple of pixels to the right to open in a new > tab, then releasing it. I'm thinking it may be nice to make this work > without the need of dragging, so by default it selects open in a new > tab. We can place a threshold to not consider quick press and release > events to cause the selection to be clicked. > > The same may be also doable with the left button, so if you click but > keep it pressed for a configurable threshold it is opened in a new > tab (of the other way around). Interesting! I like this idea and think it would be useful in various situations like limited hardware, or accessibility needs, etc. Hopefully its not too difficult to implement. Regards, Alex _______________________________________________ Dillo-dev mailing list -- dillo-dev@mailman3.com To unsubscribe send an email to dillo-dev-le...@mailman3.com
