On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 01:30:10PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > Set max line length to 100. I don't want to silence the LONG_LINE > warning altogether, and I'd still prefer to keep lines under 80 > characters, but I also don't want to see all the noise, and nor do I > want to see silly code trying to arbitrarily squeeze under 80 when it > doesn't make sense. 100 is a nice arbitrary round number... I hope > review catches silly stuff regardless. Fingers crossed. > > BIT_MACRO. We have (1 << N) all over the place. I hope to switch to > BIT() macro eventually, but this documents current use. > > PREFER_KERNEL_TYPES. We also have uint(8|16|32|64)_t all over the > place. I also hope to move towards kernel types, but this documents > current use. > > SPLIT_STRING, LONG_LINE_STRING. Don't nag about strings split to many > lines, but also don't nag about strings not split. > > There's plenty more that could be tweaked, but let's start with > something to improve the S/N ratio of the automated CI checkpatch > reports. Now that we have --show-types included in the output, we can > more easily discuss the ignores on a case-by-case basis. > > Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hi...@intel.com> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahti...@linux.intel.com> > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nik...@intel.com> > --- > dim | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/dim b/dim > index 4ba1c7ff490a..9fa6d9cd855b 100755 > --- a/dim > +++ b/dim > @@ -1390,7 +1390,7 @@ function checkpatch_commit > profile_options="" > ;; > drm-intel) > - profile_options="" > + profile_options="--max-line-length=100 > --ignore=BIT_MACRO,PREFER_KERNEL_TYPES,SPLIT_STRING,LONG_LINE_STRING"
I've scrolled a bit through checkpatch complaines with this, and I think it looks a lot more reasonable. There's also a huge pile of stuff that we should probably have fixed when the patches landed, so CI'ing this looks good. Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch> Aside: Should we encourage checkpatch patches to clean this up, with the note that they must use the drm-intel profile and the caveat that we might want to add more stuff to our ignore list instead of taking the patches? -Daniel > ;; > *) > echoerr "Unknown checkpatch profile $profile" > -- > 2.11.0 > > _______________________________________________ > Intel-gfx mailing list > intel-...@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dim-tools mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dim-tools