Forgot about this old patch/thread...

On 26/04/2018 12:58, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 1:40 PM, Tvrtko Ursulin
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 26/04/2018 12:37, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:

From: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>

For patch authors and committers with multiple email addresses, it is good
to check all 'From:' lines before deciding to add a Signed-off-by line.
This prevents adding duplicate S-o-B's in those cases.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
---
   dim | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dim b/dim
index 091dff8518ed..b587a4d1bccf 100755
--- a/dim
+++ b/dim
@@ -824,6 +824,22 @@ function dim_push
         dim_push_branch $(git_current_branch) "$@"
   }
   +function is_own_patch
+{
+       patch="$1"
+       committer_email="$2"
+
+       grep "From:" $patch | while read patch_from; do
+               [[ "$patch_from" == *"$committer_email"* ]] && exit 99
+       done
+
+       if [ $? -eq 99 ]; then
+               return 0
+       else
+               return 1
+       fi
+}
+
   function apply_patch #patch_file
   {
         local patch message_id committer_email patch_from sob rv
@@ -833,10 +849,7 @@ function apply_patch #patch_file
         message_id=$(message_get_id $patch)
         committer_email=$(git_committer_email)
   -     patch_from=$(grep "From:" "$patch" | head -1)
-       if [[ "$patch_from" != *"$committer_email"* ]] ; then
-               sob=-s
-       fi
+       is_own_patch "$patch" "$committer_email" || sob=-s
         git am --scissors -3 $sob "$@" $patch



Alternatively (and much simpler) we could grep for the actual S-o-B tag with
committer's email? Or there was a reason we started with 'From:' grepping,
can't remember.

Accident of history most likely, but in other places we do check the
git author vs. the git committer, and require that both put their sob
on the patch (e.g. in dim push).

While it's still an mbox From: == git author.

So this might work, but not sure you can push it without again upsetting dim.

I also find the multiple sob I occasionally put on my patches amusing :-)

... but I still carry this locally.

Is it a viable extension/improvement for dim? How would it upset it?

Btw I am not completely happy with the exit 99 trick but don't have enough bash skills to come up with a better way.

Regards,

Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
dim-tools mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dim-tools

Reply via email to