I think this is rather a limitation of less, which requires both startmark and endmark on the same screen. I saw also a problem with a small block if the end of block is not in the screen, it is not colorized.
I will provide a version with per line marking (instead of overkill per word). Nevertheless, I think this version is theoritically correct. It is important for other outputs than less, i.e. html, tex, troff..., or if we want to extend wd to do word level merging. Marc On Wed, 21 May 2008 14:31:52 +0200 Philippe Bergheaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > wd-0.6 (shipped with dim-0.4.8-mv8) does not colorize big (greater than a > screen) blocks of deleted lines. > > It seems that (at least some of the) suppressed endmark/startmark pairs > were not as redundant as thought. > > Philippe > -- > Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
