* Ottone Maurizio Grasso ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Hallvar Helleseth wrote: > > > > Yeah, just let me know if you want it. It has basic stuff working but > > might be considered at little hackish at the moment. > > Thank you, of course I want it: I took a peek at the demo and it looked > impressive :-) > And, besides that the more code one sees, the better it is ;-) > Can you send me it or point me to a download site? Sure, I just need to make a *few* changes, so hopefully by tomorrow I'll put it somewhere - This day is pretty much occupied :(
Anyways I found out today that Xine's performace isn't as bad as I once though - the poor performance I've gotten on my music videos is because of libmad (mp3 decoder) which is about the slowest one available (but should have great quality - 24bit) I tried xine without any audio today and it's performance matches MPlayer. This makes to obvios choice to use Xine instead of MPlayer. Just need to wait till they find out they want to use a different mp3 decoder (hopefully). MPlayer still supports more formats, but Xine has got the formats that I personnaly need. > > Don't know if I'll > > ever change that, since I'm going for a provider based on MPlayer > > instead (MUUUUCH better performace - but can't play videos simultaneously yet) > > By checking the old posts to the list I read about the two video > providers you have been working at: Xine's and Mplayer's. > I'll try to compile and use them. > What's the most promising one (in terms of resource occupation and > functionalities) according to you ? As far as the actually commandline players are concerned I prefer MPlayer to Xine - but that's a subjective look. I can't really say anything about resource usage yet but I'll try to find out sometime. I'll let you know when I've put up the Xine provider sources! Enjoy your time inbetween if you can ;) Hallvar Helleseth -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe directfb-dev" as subject.
