Well, there in lies my problem, thanks Denis. It seems that for srcFormat and dstFormat registers, the values are 1 for 8 bit and 3 for 16 bit.
Thanks, David Wood -----Original Message----- From: Denis Oliver Kropp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 7:08 PM To: Wood, David Cc: Directfb-Dev (E-mail) Subject: Re: [directfb-dev] DFB_PIXELFORMAT_INDEX Macro Quoting Wood, David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I noticed in my source and destination validation it's setting the srcformat > to be the return of DFB_PIXELFORMAT_INDEX macro. I'm running in 16bit mode, > my supposition at the moment is that the return values of > DFB_PIXELFORMAT_INDEX do not exactly match the proper values for the > srcFormat and dstFormat registers on the 2D chipset for the Voodoo. For a > 16bit rgb surface, what is the final return of this macro? I suppose I > could calculate it myself, but I thought I'd be lazy and ask. DFB_PIXELFORMAT_INDEX( DSPF_RGB16 ) is 1. DFB_PIXELFORMAT_INDEX( DSPF_RGB32 ) is 3. So it seems to use the right entries of blitFormat[]. -- Best regards, Denis Oliver Kropp .------------------------------------------. | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | | http://www.directfb.org/ | "------------------------------------------" convergence integrated media GmbH -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe directfb-dev" as subject.
