Hi, Ville Syrj�l� <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here's the patch to remove the useless > dfb_surfacemanager_assure_system() call. I'm not sure if it's useless here. Dok said: > If you use the dfb_surface_*_lock() functions you don't have to care > about that function, because it's called by the locking functions. I think he was speaking about the dfb_software_[soft|hard]ware_lock() functions, not dfb_surfacemanager_lock() which is what you are using. I might be wrong but I think the call to dfb_surfacemanager_assure_system() is needed or the the code should be changed to use dfb_surface_[soft|hard]ware_lock() instead. Salut, Sven -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe directfb-dev" as subject.
