I was just messing about in the software accel code implementing ALUT44 support. Sorry Dok couldn't resist ;) I've noticed a few small issues unrelated to ALUT44.
1. What's the idea behind the current implementation of Sop_lut8_to_Dacc()? It processes 8 pixels per each loop iteration. On my system however I get much better performance by processing only one pixel per iteration. df_dok's fill blend benchmarks show a considerable speed imrovement (fill_rect_blend 1.90 vs. 0.60 MPixels/s). Draw blend benchmarks also benefit though not as much. 2. Shouldn't Bop_PFI_SKto_Aop and Bop_PFI_Sto_Aop have _PFI suffix like the non-stretch versions? I forgot the rest already :) -- Ville Syrj�l� [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/ -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe directfb-dev" as subject.
