On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 08:57:47PM -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote: > I tried to apply just the patch from CVS: > > diff -u DirectFB/gfxdrivers/matrox/matrox_crtc2.c:1.26 > DirectFB/gfxdrivers/matrox/matrox_crtc2.c:1.27 > --- DirectFB/gfxdrivers/matrox/matrox_crtc2.c:1.26 Tue Mar 30 21:13:42 2004+++ > DirectFB/gfxdrivers/matrox/matrox_crtc2.c Thu Apr 22 17:49:59 2004 > @@ -244,6 +244,8 @@ > /* remember configuration */ > mcrtc2->config = *config; > > + mcrtc2->field = !config->parity; > + > crtc2_calc_regs( mdrv, mcrtc2, config, surface ); > crtc2_calc_buffer( mdrv, mcrtc2, surface ); > > to my somewhat old (somewhere between 0.9.20 and CVS HEAD) source pool > and I got a: > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../include -I../../src -D_REENTRANT -Wall > -O3 -ffast-math -pipe -Werror-implicit-function-declaration > -Wp,-MD,.deps/matrox_crtc2.pp -c matrox_crtc2.c -fPIC -DPIC -o matrox_crtc2.lo > matrox_crtc2.c: In function `crtc2SetConfiguration': > matrox_crtc2.c:263: error: structure has no member named `parity' > make[3]: *** [matrox_crtc2.lo] Error 1 > > I guess my source pool is too old for the patch, but I am reluctant to > bit off on updating my whole DirectFB to the current CVS HEAD. > > Is the above fix relevant at all to rev. 1.18 > gfxdrivers/matrox/matrox_crtc2.c?
No. 1.18 is the last revision before the big display layer core changes. Field parity should work normally in that version. -- Ville Syrj�l� [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/ -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe directfb-dev" as subject.
