Quoting Ian Walters: > > Using stylesheets, I'm a total beginner, so if something could > > be done better, please tell me. Especially the table stuff still > > sucks. > > It looks like a good use of css. One thing I will mention is that I dislike > having a website dictate fonts to me. e.g. arial helvetica should also have > a generic option in case the user has neither of those fonts... e.g. (From > css spec) > > <generic-family> > The following generic families are defined: 'serif', 'sans-serif', 'cursive', > 'fantasy', and 'monospace'.
Ah, I didn't know that. The generic name is sufficient. > In the above case, it would be sans-serif. Now I know arial and helvetica on > pretty much everyones system anyway, but its a good habit to get into to > include a generic name. In fact I would go so far as to say only use the > generic name. I much prefer the bitstream fonts over arial or helvetica. > > Since table stuff takes longer I might look at that when I have more time. > however apart from the font tags in the content, looks ok to me. > > Good work. Thanks. -- Best regards, Denis Oliver Kropp .------------------------------------------. | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | | http://www.directfb.org/ | "------------------------------------------" Convergence GmbH
