On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 11:47:12PM +0200, Denis Oliver Kropp wrote:
> Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 04:26:39AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 06:14:58 +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> >>
> >>>This patch by Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, fixes a build failure
> >>>on amd64 due to types clashing by including 'dfb_types.h' instead
> >>>of 'asm/types.h' (needs to be applied after the fbdev one, or just
> >>>ignore the error from the missing file).
> >>
> >>There has been another build failure on Debian GNU/Linux amd64, due
> >>to the redefinition of kernel types from userland. Here's a better
> >>approach, rename all kernel types from userland to proper userland
> >>ones. I've chosen the inet types as they are the ones currently used
> >>in "dfb_types.h", but those could be changed to use <stdint.h> as well.
> >
> >
> > I vote for stdint.h/inttypes.h because that eliminates one unecessary
> > underscore in the unsigned types. Unfortunately that still leaves
> > unecessary crap in the type names ('int' and '_t'). Would s8,u8,...
> > create more problems? The kernel at least shouldn't expose those types
> > to user-space.
>
> I think that would even look much better in the online documentation.
>
> I vote for that, too :)
Which one? stdint.h or s8,u8,...?
--
Ville Syrjälä
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/
_______________________________________________
directfb-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
