강인표 wrote: > I tested GTK+ over DirectFB’s performance using gtkperf tool. > > Test result surprised me. > > Below is my test result using $./gtkperf –a –c 100 in my target. > > > > GTK+2.6 over Tiny X : 97.14 sec > > GTK+2.8 over Tiny X : 160.28 sec > > GTK+2.9 over DirectFB : 458.65 sec > > > > I know GTK+2.8 is slower than GTK+2.6. > > But I cannot understand why GTK+ over DirectFB is much slower than GtK+ > over TinyX. > > Many reports said that DirectFB is slower than TinyX, > > but they didn’t explain the reason of bad performance.
That's not true, but GTK+ on DirectFB is slower than on TinyX, because the GTK+ implementation on DirectFB is not very optimal. If you compare DirectFB and TinyX themself you'll get different results. -- Best regards, Denis Oliver Kropp .------------------------------------------. | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | | http://www.directfb.org/ | "------------------------------------------" _______________________________________________ directfb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
