Maxim Syrchin wrote: > Hello all, > Seems like fusiondev major may conflict with drivers which use > register_chardev(0,...) (i.e. dynamically allocated major). So, maybe it > is a good idea to mke fusiondev majot dynamically allocated too ? Please > look at code in patch attached.
I've just integrated your patch locally, but the 2.4 case of handling the dynamic allocation doesn't look complete to me, fusion_major will always stay 0. -- Best regards, Denis Oliver Kropp .------------------------------------------. | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | | http://www.directfb.org/ | '------------------------------------------' _______________________________________________ directfb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
