On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 09:21:25AM -0700, Mike Emmel wrote:
> On 5/30/06, Ville Syrjälä <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 10:18:43PM -0700, Mike Emmel wrote:
> > > On 5/29/06, Ville Syrjälä <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 04:55:15PM -0700, Mike Emmel wrote:
> > > > > I was looking at the implementation of this function and was surprised
> > > > > to see it creates a window. Explanation ?
> > > >
> > > > It creates an IDirectFBWindow object but it doesn't actully create a new
> > > > window (CoreWindow).
> > > >
> > > Yes I realized that its not clear that its created with the right
> > > properties either.
> >
> > I don't see anything wrong with it. It first check if the core window
> > exits and then constructs the object.
> >
> > > Why  are we not saving a back pointer when we create the interface ?
> >
> > That's not how it's supposed to work. It is quite possible you didn't
> > even create the window but someone else did.
> >
> > > This function is a leak waiting to happen.
> >
> > Why exactly? If you don't release it you leak it. That's how things work
> > in DirectFB.
> >
> > > Create should allocate Get should return and existing interface or null.
> >
> > You can have multiple interfaces to the same core object.
> >
> 
> I don't disagree with a function that does this  it should be called
> Attach or better CreateInterface 

That would mean renaming many public API methods. Not a good idea 
because all apps would need to follow.

<snip>
> 
> At the minimum
> 
> Retrieve an interface to an existing window.
> 
> Is highly misleading documentation it should say
> 
> Create and interface to an existing window.

I just looked at the docs before reading this part of your email and I 
had the exact same wording in mind :) I think all Get<something> methods 
have a similar description so they should all be changed.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/

_______________________________________________
directfb-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev

Reply via email to