On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 03:59:24PM +0100, Claudio Ciccani wrote: > Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 02:19:17PM +0100, Denis Oliver Kropp wrote: > >> Daniel Laird schrieb: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> I used to use a makefile from buildroot to build Directfb 0.9.25.1 this > >>> file > >>> used the version number everywhere (0.9.25.1) to create paths and > >>> directories etc. > >>> > >>> I have just tried this on DirectFB-1.0.0 and have noticed is does not > >>> work, > >>> When I investigated further it would appear that the configure script has > >>> changed the following variable from: > >>> BINARY_VERSION=$DIRECTFB_MAJOR_VERSION.$DIRECTFB_MINOR_VERSION.$LT_CURRENT > >>> to: > >>> BINARY_VERSION=$DIRECTFB_MAJOR_VERSION.$DIRECTFB_MINOR_VERSION.$LT_CURRENT > >> BINARY_VERSION=$DIRECTFB_MAJOR_VERSION.$DIRECTFB_MINOR_VERSION-$LT_CURRENT > >> > >> :) > >> > >>> This is then used by > >>> MODULEDIRNAME=directfb-$BINARY_VERSION > >>> > >>> So now Directfb version 1.0.0 installs into directories called 1.0-0 > >>> I have never understood configure etc so was wondering if there was a > >>> reason > >>> for this change? > >> The reason is that I want to keep binary compatible modules in the same > >> directory. This means whenever binary compatibility breaks in the 1.0 > >> line, it will become 1.0-1, 1.0-2... > > > > Maybe we should add a moduledir variable to directfb.pc? > > > > directfb-internal.pc already has a moduledir variable.
Ah, good. -- Ville Syrjälä [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sci.fi/~syrjala/ _______________________________________________ directfb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
