On 3/6/07, Denis Oliver Kropp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marcel Siegert schrieb: > > On Tuesday 06 March 2007, Denis Oliver Kropp wrote: > >> Marcel Siegert schrieb: > >>> On Tuesday 06 March 2007, Denis Oliver Kropp wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> someone here with some tips for moving to git? > >>>> > >>>> Otherwise, I'll just do the usual apt-get + RTFM. > >>>> > >>> > >>> hi denis, > >>> > >>> what do you want to move to git? > >>> directfb and its modules, coprojects? > >> Yes, all of them. > >> > > > > args, > > > > why are you planning to do so? > > > > swimming with the hype? > > > > or is cvs too unuseable? > > > > if that is the point, i would recommend subversion. > > cvs == svn > > I like distributed repositories. At the moment I'm having > different CVS repositories for different projects, each > having its own DirectFB module. Merging between them is > always done manually with cvs diff and patch etc. > > How would svn solve that?
Well, svn allows for a much more flexible organization. It basically allows you to go back to the old "make a copy of my source tree" for tagging used before the days of SCMs. But it tracks all of those changes. Tagging and Branching are done by "Copy", but only a linked copy, so it doesn't take a whole bunch of resources. _______________________________________________ directfb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
