I checked src/fusion/* on both 1.0.0 and 0.9.14 and...
Sorry, so far I can not understand what I should do yet.
It would be a tough hack?
Anyway, dont drop the support of user land IPC.
Please rivive the support!!!!.
--------
>>
>> Reasons:
>> 1. OSes other than Linux do not have fusion.ko
>> How to run current DirectFB on FreeBSD with --enable-multi?
>
>Option 1: Implement freebsd-fusion
>Option 2: Implement libfusion using other IPC mechanism(s)
>
>> 2. A distribution ( Debian or Fedora or..) does not like necessity
>> of special kernel driver.
>> At least, unless you have precompiled fusion.ko to all existing
>> kernel binaries for each distribution, distribution does not
>> adopt DirectFB. But, you do it? you provide all modules? who does it?
>>
>> In the next version, please add (revive) support of libfusion.so.
>
>That would be option 2 then. If you think it's feasible why don't you do it?
>
>
Yes, what I need is this. libfusion.so without using fusion.ko.
Please let me have some questions.
1. Dont you have any plan to revive normal IPC support to libfusion
in the near future?
2. Why you have dropped support of normal IPC?
Kernel mode IPC is okay, because faster. But dont drop user mode one!.
3. All apps (as far as you know) use fusion.ko through libfusion.so?
Or some rude apps use fusion.ko directly?
--- Okajima, Jun. Tokyo, Japan.
_______________________________________________
directfb-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
_______________________________________________
directfb-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
