Not sure what you mean about not correctly send me a path that can be applied to the current GTK svn and I'll look at it. Or add a new patch to the bug. If I recall a small amount of refactoring was done to clean the code up and I think take care of some null checks its been a long time,.
Now other changes could have since broken the patch who knows. I don't know about this second patch it should be done as a new bug. He probably added it to a closed bug. On 10/20/07, Binary Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I just read the memory leak bug patched by Simon.Lanzmich, Simon > submitted two emails, the first and the second differs, the latter is: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg06425.html > > But I took a look in gtk+'s SVN tree, find the applied patch is the > first one, which still cause problem on Directfb-1.0.0. Because there is > a lost reference in Simon's graph, that is in dfb_window_create(), the > dfb_wm_add_window() will also add one reference to CoreWindow(in unique > window manager). The reference is removed by dfb_wm_remove_window() > which is called by IDirectFBWindow_Destroy(). > > So Simon's second patch handles this problem, but seems not applied > correctly? > > The URL for the SVN is: > > http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gtk% > 2B/trunk/gdk/directfb/gdkwindow-directfb.c?r1=18004&r2=18459 > > Thanks. > Bin > > > _______________________________________________ > directfb-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev > _______________________________________________ directfb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
