Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: > Denis Oliver Kropp wrote: >> Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: >>> Yesterday i noticed the very same issue Reny spotted (even without the >>> HACK files). >>> So my idea is committing the single gdkevens patch now and wait some >>> more before applying the last set of patches proposed by dok, os that >>> those issues can be adressed properly. >> Do problems exist if you leave out the hacks and the rgb16 patch? > > If i leave out the rgb16 patch, the problem disappears and everything > works fine as before. > > I just committed your previous patch for gdk events in trunk and > gtk-2-10, only to discover it causes a crash on toplevel window closing > (META + C), i'll try to fix it.
I just verified that the GdkDirectFB patch alone doesn't cause the bug, so its recent commit was ok. The bug i ran into (try closing the "icon view basic" window in gtk-demo, trace attached) was istead caused by window_flip_group.patch and is triggered only when NO_EXPERIMENTS is *not* defined, otherwise the patch is ok. I'll do more testing tomorrows. Attilio Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 0xb75b76b0 (LWP 29606)] 0xb7f57dfd in IA__gdk_window_get_toplevel (window=0x837c0e0) at gdkwindow.c:617 617 while (GDK_WINDOW_TYPE (obj) == GDK_WINDOW_CHILD) (gdb) bt #0 0xb7f57dfd in IA__gdk_window_get_toplevel (window=0x837c0e0) at gdkwindow.c:617 #1 0xb7f6f41c in gdk_window_directfb_process_all_updates () at gdkwindow-directfb.c:105 #2 0xb7f6f4d7 in gdk_window_update_idle (data=0x0) at gdkwindow-directfb.c:134 #3 0xb7f39b4f in gdk_threads_dispatch (data=0x838e760) at gdk.c:470 #4 0xb78d7661 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 _______________________________________________ directfb-dev mailing list directfb-dev@directfb.org http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
