Let me think about this some more...
On Dec 17, 2007 8:58 AM, Denis Oliver Kropp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Emmel wrote: > > I was wondering of we could make this change > > > > diff --git a/configure.in b/configure.in > > index 2349cec..67db470 100644 > > --- a/configure.in > > +++ b/configure.in > > @@ -365,9 +365,6 @@ AC_ARG_ENABLE(debug, > > enable_debug=no) > > if test "$enable_debug" = "yes"; then > > CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -g3 -fno-inline" > > - DIRECT_BUILD_DEBUG=1 > > -else > > - DIRECT_BUILD_DEBUG=0 > > fi > > > > > > We have another flag --enable-debug-support > > > > So the combination --enable-debug --enable-debug-support get the full > > debug version while --enable-debug will just get the standard C symbol > > debug. > > --enable-debug-support does not enable debug messages in libdirectfb, but > builts the necessary code into libdirect to do debug builds of other > libraries, > e.g. libdirectfb or external libraries. > > --enable-debug was used to enable expansion of debug macros in libdirect, > libfusion and libdirectfb code, in addition to CFLAGS changes. > > But I understand that setting the compiler flags should be separate, either > by setting them from outside (CFLAGS=-g3 ./configure) or by adding another > parameter. > > > The reason is I'm seeing some problems that may potentially be related > > to C++ and the enhanced debug support. > > I've made this change locally for various other reasons in the past. > > Compiler issues with the macros? > > -- > Best regards, > Denis Oliver Kropp > > .------------------------------------------. > | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | > | http://www.directfb.org/ | > "------------------------------------------" > _______________________________________________ directfb-dev mailing list directfb-dev@directfb.org http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
