Guillem Jover wrote: > On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 15:17:39 +0100, Denis Oliver Kropp wrote: >> Do you have more information about this? > > Sure.
Thanks, it's almost clear now :) >> Guillem Jover wrote: > Oh, yes -lm should go as well, can fix the patch and resend. I'll take care of it after applying yours. >> And what in the static case? > > The static case is handled by directfb-config, and that one includes What if only libpng.a and libz.a exist and it's only checking for -lpng to be working? > all the indirect dependencies, would be better to switch it to use > pkg-config, though. Yeah, I found libpng.pc recently and was quite surprised :) >>> diff --git a/directfb-config.in b/directfb-config.in >>> index 568831b..5bd4b91 100644 >>> --- a/directfb-config.in >>> +++ b/directfb-config.in >>> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ while test $# -gt 0; do >>> echo_videoprovider="$echo_videoprovider -lmpeg3" >>> ;; >>> swf) >>> - echo_videoprovider="$echo_videoprovider -ljpeg -lz" >>> + echo_videoprovider="$echo_videoprovider -ljpeg" >> same as with libpng > > This one is only relevant for the static linking case, but I removed it > because I don't see on my system that libjpeg.so.* is using libz.so.*. > I can check the source code in case it could be possible that it could > use it, in that case it will be safer to just re-add it. Unfortunately > libjpeg does not have a pkg-config file. I did not find any zlib dependencies in libjpeg, so this change is fine, too. -- Best regards, Denis Oliver Kropp .------------------------------------------. | DirectFB - Hardware accelerated graphics | | http://www.directfb.org/ | "------------------------------------------" _______________________________________________ directfb-dev mailing list directfb-dev@directfb.org http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
