Hi Andre' Yes, I should have used dfb_surface_pool_get_local with the "dfb_" prefix. I accidently followed another function we had added locally that did not have the prefix either. :(
Timothy -- Timothy Strelchun CE Software Engineering Digital Home Group Intel Corporation >-----Original Message----- >From: directfb-dev-boun...@directfb.org >[mailto:directfb-dev-boun...@directfb.org] On Behalf Of Andre DRASZIK >Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 3:17 AM >To: directfb-dev@directfb.org >Subject: Re: [directfb-dev] {DirectFB} Added systems driver >specific shared surface data structure > >Hi, > >On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 10:16 +0200, d...@directfb.org wrote: >> >http://git.directfb.org/?p=core/DirectFB.git;a=commit;h=e0e0cb670e8de9 >> 0c1f3cc99529acf7e520f37196 commit >> e0e0cb670e8de90c1f3cc99529acf7e520f37196 >> Author: Denis Oliver Kropp <d...@skunk.intern.txtr.com> >> Date: Thu Sep 23 10:07:58 2010 +0200 >> >> Added surface_pool_get_local >> >> Added the function surface_pool_get_local to enable a surface >> buffer pool to obtain its own local data. Useful for custom >> surface buffer pools so that they do not have to explicitly >> store a static local pointer to it during init/join. >> >> patch by timothy.strelc...@intel.com >> >> src/core/surface_pool.c | 12 +++++++++++- >> src/core/surface_pool.h | 8 +++++++- >> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >I am wondering about namespace here - this should have been >dfb_surface_pool_get_local(), no? > > >Cheers, >Andre' _______________________________________________ directfb-dev mailing list directfb-dev@directfb.org http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
