Hello,
Sorry to insist, but i am really confused about this.

I can see 2 ways:
1) app takes directfb object, and does everything:
- creates, layer, window, etc, and shares the window surface through shm
- clients only get the surface and paint to it, no dfb objects
involved client app, only ipc/rpc

2)
each app gets their own dfb object, and using their local dfb object,
create windows, surfaces, and share then to the server.

thanks,



On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Alberich de megres
<alberich...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm newbie starting in the directfb world.
>
> I know this could sound stupid, but I want to understand the layers
> and how coupled or not they are. Can directfb be used without fusion,
> but with some other IPC mechanism?
>
> This comes becouse I'm building a simple GUI env,  just to learn how
> directfb works, and I'm not sure about the differences of the 2
> possible ways:
> 1) directfb with enable-multi + fusion.
> 2) directfb with a server app, with --disable-multi and communications
> with other IPC, like android binder
>
> My main doubt is here is
> Application communicate with servers using fusion, but do they need to
> get their own IDirecFB object? Or the server share its dfb interface
> using shm?
>
> As you can see i'm a little bit confused.
>
> thanks!
_______________________________________________
directfb-dev mailing list
directfb-dev@directfb.org
http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev

Reply via email to