I reported a problem some time ago and sent also a fix proposition (http://mail.directfb.org/pipermail/directfb-dev/2012-July/006576.html) and there is no response yet. How should I understand it? a) probem does not exist, unless in his imagination, so ignore him b) problem does exist, but there are more important issues (segfault is not a big deal...), so ignore him c) problem maybe exists, but maybe not, so better ignore him.
Regards, Lukasz On 08/29/2012 08:31 AM, Lukasz Rubaszewski wrote: > Are you planning to fix the problem (by merging my patch or in other > way) which I have reported quite a while ago? > > Regards, > Lukasz > > On 07/17/2012 11:38 AM, Lukasz Rubaszewski wrote: >> Function dfb_input_remove_device calls fusion_reactor_dispatch, which >> frees resources pointed by "device" pointer. After that "device" is >> still used in following calls: fusion_ref_zero_trylock, >> fusion_ref_unlock and fusion_ref_destroy. >> If freed area is overwritten (by another allocation) before mentioned >> calls then it might end with: >> - segmentation faults in case of release build, >> - MAGIC asserts in fusion in case of debug builds. >> >> Patch replaces "device" variable with "shared". >> >> Lukasz >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> directfb-dev mailing list >> directfb-dev@directfb.org >> http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > directfb-dev mailing list > directfb-dev@directfb.org > http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev > _______________________________________________ directfb-dev mailing list directfb-dev@directfb.org http://mail.directfb.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/directfb-dev
