Ville Syrj�l� said: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 05:02:08PM +0100, Duncan Webb wrote: >> "Sven Neumann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Setting the Reply-To: header field by the mailing-list server is >> > considered harmful for some good reasons. Please read >> > >> > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html. >> > >> This is an interesting article and seems to be based from sending person >> mail to >> a list. >> >> When you reply to a message on the list most, if not all, of the time >> you want >> to send the reply to the list. >> >> Using reply-all means that you should then edit the to: and cc: line of >> the mail >> to only send the reply to the list. Otherwise the sender receives two >> mails. > > Use mutt. It has a list-reply feature. It also has a ton of other useful > features.
Most of the time this is not possible, because I'm often at a site that has severly restricted internet access (doesn't even allow ftp). Currently, I'm forced to use a web based interface. But thanks to Andre and Ville for the information about mutt. Duncan -- Info: To unsubscribe send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe directfb-users" as subject.
