On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 11:41, Tom Schouten wrote: > > > I'm developing quite a similar system for experiments in our Oculomotor > > Lab. > > > > this sounds interesting. do you have some more info or links or papers?
umm. unfortunately currently not. being in an early development phase, there are not much docs other than requirement analysis and in-source comments. and as the project was never meant to be developed or used by others than our lab, the code is not publicly accessible atm. However, from my POV some code examination or testing by others would do no harm. So if there is interest, I could ask my boss for permission to provide public read access to our repository. Of course there wouldn't be much support other than fixing reported bugs that could bug us, too. ;) > my suggestion would be to use a 2.4 kernel with low-latency patches. > all things i tried for my audio work with the 2.6 kernels were far > worse than 2.4, which runs rock solid for the response i need. hmm, we used 2.6 since this one has already preemption and some latency patches in the standard configuration and was said to be much better than standard 2.4. we hoped to succeed with standard kernels easing system setup and maintenance. but if we determine that 2.6 isn't reliable, we'll have to rethink this decision. thanks for your hints. jan
